Much of the talk on this blog during February and March centers around the battle between the Big East and the ACC for college roundball superiority.  Some bloggers (like the Borg) point out the 7 NCAA berths for the ACC as a sign of conference superiority while others (like me) point to 2 of the last 4 Champions as evidence of Big East superiority.

The truth is that early tournament results show that NEITHER conference may be the best this year.

Through two rounds, the PAC-10 has won 70% of their games and has 3 schools (Oregon, UCLA, and USC) in the Sweet 16.  Only the SEC has had better results, winning 78% of their games and likewise placing 3 teams (Florida, Vanderbilt, Tennessee) in the Sweet 16.  The Big 12 has been a surprise, winning 71% of their games and placing 2 strong teams (Kansas and TXAM) in the Sweet 16.

Between the two power conferences of the east, the Big East has outplayed the ACC. 

The Big East, without perennial powers UConn and Syracuse, still won 56% of their games and has 2 teams (Georgetown and Pitt) still alive for the championship.  The ACC has won only half of their games and has only North Carolina remaining.  Duke exhibited their overrating once again as one of only 2 teams (along with Notre Dame) to lose to a higher seed in the entire first round of the tournament (9 over 8 does not count), extending their losing streak to 4 games to end the season.  That is Duke’s SECOND 4-game losing streak of the season, with 3 of the 4 losses coming against unranked teams. 

The Big East also won the only head-to-head matchup between the conferences with Georgetown easily downing Boston College 62-55.  Since leaving the Big East in 2005, the Eagles have ended their season against a former Big East rival in both 2006 and 2007.  It appears that Georgetown will have to knock off another ACC team to reach the Final Four as they and UNC are only a win each against a 6 and 5 seed respectively to meet in the Regional Final.